Eye-tracking the moving medical image: Development and investigation of a novel investigational tool for CT Colonography

Colorectal cancer remains the third most common cancer in the UK but the second leading cause of cancer death with >16,000 dying per year. Many advances have been made in recent years in all areas of investigation for colorectal cancer, one of the more notable being the widespread introduction of CT Colonography (CTC). CTC has rapidly established itself as a cornerstone of diagnosis for colonic neoplasia and much work has been done to standardise and assure quality in practice in both the acquisition and interpretation of the technique. A novel feature of CTC is the presentation of imaging in both traditional 2D and the ‘virtual’ 3D endoluminal formats. This thesis looks at expanding our understanding of and improving our performance in utilizing the endoluminal 3D view. We present and develop novel metrics applicable to eye-tracking the moving image, so that the complex dynamic nature of 3D endoluminal fly-through interpretation can be captured. These metrics are then applied to assess the effect of important elements of image interpretation, namely, reader experience, the effect of the use Computer Aided Detection (CAD) and the influence of the expected prevalence of abnormality. We review our findings with reference to the literature of eye tracking within medical imaging. In the co-registration section we apply our validated computer-assisted registration algorithm to the matching of 3D endoluminal colonic locations between temporally separate datasets, assessing its accuracy as an aid to colonic polyp surveillance with CTC

Computer-assisted polyp matching between optical colonoscopy and CT colonography: a phantom study

Potentially precancerous polyps detected with CT colonography (CTC) need to be removed subsequently, using an optical colonoscope (OC). Due to large colonic deformations induced by the colonoscope, even very experienced colonoscopists find it difficult to pinpoint the exact location of the colonoscope tip in relation to polyps reported on CTC. This can cause unduly prolonged OC examinations that are stressful for the patient, colonoscopist and supporting staff. We developed a method, based on monocular 3D reconstruction from OC images, that automatically matches polyps observed in OC with polyps reported on prior CTC. A matching cost is computed, using rigid point-based registration between surface point clouds extracted from both modalities. A 3D printed and painted phantom of a 25 cm long transverse colon segment was used to validate the method on two medium sized polyps. Results indicate that the matching cost is smaller at the correct corresponding polyp between OC and CTC: the value is 3.9 times higher at the incorrect polyp, comparing the correct match between polyps to the incorrect match. Furthermore, we evaluate the matching of the reconstructed polyp from OC with other colonic endoluminal surface structures such as haustral folds and show that there is a minimum at the correct polyp from CTC. Automated matching between polyps observed at OC and prior CTC would facilitate the biopsy or removal of true-positive pathology or exclusion of false-positive CTC findings, and would reduce colonoscopy false-negative (missed) polyps. Ultimately, such a method might reduce healthcare costs, patient inconvenience and discomfort.Comment: This paper was presented at the SPIE Medical Imaging 2014 conferenc

Respiratory motion correction in dynamic MRI using robust data decomposition registration - Application to DCE-MRI.

Motion correction in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE-) MRI is challenging because rapid intensity changes can compromise common (intensity based) registration algorithms. In this study we introduce a novel registration technique based on robust principal component analysis (RPCA) to decompose a given time-series into a low rank and a sparse component. This allows robust separation of motion components that can be registered, from intensity variations that are left unchanged. This Robust Data Decomposition Registration (RDDR) is demonstrated on both simulated and a wide range of clinical data. Robustness to different types of motion and breathing choices during acquisition is demonstrated for a variety of imaged organs including liver, small bowel and prostate. The analysis of clinically relevant regions of interest showed both a decrease of error (15-62% reduction following registration) in tissue time-intensity curves and improved areas under the curve (AUC60) at early enhancement

CT colonography: external clinical validation of an algorithm for computer-assisted prone and supine registration

Purpose To perform external validation of a computer-assisted registration algorithm for prone and supine computed tomographic (CT) colonography and to compare the results with those of an existing centerline method. Materials and Methods All contributing centers had institutional review board approval; participants provided informed consent. A validation sample of CT colonographic examinations of 51 patients with 68 polyps (6–55 mm) was selected from a publicly available, HIPAA compliant, anonymized archive. No patients were excluded because of poor preparation or inadequate distension. Corresponding prone and supine polyp coordinates were recorded, and endoluminal surfaces were registered automatically by using a computer algorithm. Two observers independently scored three-dimensional endoluminal polyp registration success. Results were compared with those obtained by using the normalized distance along the colonic centerline (NDACC) method. Pairwise Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare gross registration error and McNemar tests were used to compare polyp conspicuity. Results Registration was possible in all 51 patients, and 136 paired polyp coordinates were generated (68 polyps) to test the algorithm. Overall mean three-dimensional polyp registration error (mean ± standard deviation, 19.9 mm ± 20.4) was significantly less than that for the NDACC method (mean, 27.4 mm ± 15.1; P = .001). Accuracy was unaffected by colonic segment (P = .76) or luminal collapse (P = .066). During endoluminal review by two observers (272 matching tasks, 68 polyps, prone to supine and supine to prone coordinates), 223 (82%) polyp matches were visible (120° field of view) compared with just 129 (47%) when the NDACC method was used (P < .001). By using multiplanar visualization, 48 (70%) polyps were visible after scrolling ± 15 mm in any multiplanar axis compared with 16 (24%) for NDACC (P < .001). Conclusion Computer-assisted registration is more accurate than the NDACC method for mapping the endoluminal surface and matching the location of polyps in corresponding prone and supine CT colonographic acquisitions

CT colonography: Inverse-consistent symmetric registration of prone and supine inner colon surfaces

CT colonography interpretation is difficult and time-consuming because fecal residue or fluid can mimic or obscure polyps, leading to diagnostic errors. To compensate for this, it is normal practice to obtain CT data with the patient in prone and supine positions. Repositioning redistributes fecal residue and colonic gas; fecal residue tends to move, while fixed mural pathology does not. The cornerstone of competent interpretation is the matching of corresponding endoluminal locations between prone and supine acquisitions. Robust and accurate automated registration between acquisitions should lead to faster and more accurate detection of colorectal cancer and polyps. Any directional bias when registering the colonic surfaces could lead to incorrect anatomical correspondence resulting in reader error. We aim to reduce directional bias and so increase robustness by adapting a cylindrical registration algorithm to penalize inverse-consistency error, using a symmetric optimization. Using 17 validation cases, the mean inverse-consistency error was reduced significantly by 86%, from 3.3 mm to 0.45 mm. Furthermore, we show improved alignment of the prone and supine colonic surfaces, evidenced by a reduction in the mean-of-squared-differences by 43% overall. Mean registration error, measured at a sparse set of manually selected reference points, remained at the same level as the non-symmetric method (no significant differences). Our results suggest that the inverse-consistent symmetric algorithm performs more robustly than non-symmetric implementation of B-spline registration

Erratum to: Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkers

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s41512-016-0001-y.]

Erratum to: Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkers

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s41512-016-0001-y.]

Evidence synthesis to inform model-based cost-effectiveness evaluations of diagnostic tests: a methodological systematic review of health technology assessments

Background: Evaluations of diagnostic tests are challenging because of the indirect nature of their impact on patient outcomes. Model-based health economic evaluations of tests allow different types of evidence from various sources to be incorporated and enable cost-effectiveness estimates to be made beyond the duration of available study data. To parameterize a health-economic model fully, all the ways a test impacts on patient health must be quantified, including but not limited to diagnostic test accuracy. Methods: We assessed all UK NIHR HTA reports published May 2009-July 2015. Reports were included if they evaluated a diagnostic test, included a model-based health economic evaluation and included a systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy. From each eligible report we extracted information on the following topics: 1) what evidence aside from test accuracy was searched for and synthesised, 2) which methods were used to synthesise test accuracy evidence and how did the results inform the economic model, 3) how/whether threshold effects were explored, 4) how the potential dependency between multiple tests in a pathway was accounted for, and 5) for evaluations of tests targeted at the primary care setting, how evidence from differing healthcare settings was incorporated. Results: The bivariate or HSROC model was implemented in 20/22 reports that met all inclusion criteria. Test accuracy data for health economic modelling was obtained from meta-analyses completely in four reports, partially in fourteen reports and not at all in four reports. Only 2/7 reports that used a quantitative test gave clear threshold recommendations. All 22 reports explored the effect of uncertainty in accuracy parameters but most of those that used multiple tests did not allow for dependence between test results. 7/22 tests were potentially suitable for primary care but the majority found limited evidence on test accuracy in primary care settings. Conclusions: The uptake of appropriate meta-analysis methods for synthesising evidence on diagnostic test accuracy in UK NIHR HTAs has improved in recent years. Future research should focus on other evidence requirements for cost-effectiveness assessment, threshold effects for quantitative tests and the impact of multiple diagnostic tests

Do prevalence expectations affect patterns of visual search and decision-making in interpreting CT colonography endoluminal videos?

Objective: To assess the effect of expected abnormality prevalence on visual search and decision-making in CT colonography (CTC).Methods: 13 radiologists interpreted endoluminal CTC flythroughs of the same group of 10 patient cases, 3 times each. Abnormality prevalence was fixed (50%), but readers were told, before viewing each group, that prevalence was either 20%, 50% or 80% in the population from which cases were drawn. Infrared visual search recording was used. Readers indicated seeing a polyp by clicking a mouse. Multilevel modelling quantified the effect of expected prevalence on outcomes.Results: Differences between expected prevalence were not statistically significant for time to first pursuit of the polyp (median 0.5 s, each prevalence), pursuit rate when no polyp was on screen (median 2.7 s21, each prevalence) or number of mouse clicks [mean 0.75/ video (20% prevalence), 0.93 (50%), 0.97 (80%)]. There was weak evidence of increased tendency to look outside the central screen area at 80% prevalence and reduction in positive polyp identifications at 20% prevalence.Conclusion: This study did not find a large effect of prevalence information on most visual search metrics or polyp identification in CTC. Further research is required to quantify effects at lower prevalence and in relation to secondary outcome measures.Advances in knowledge: Prevalence effects in evaluating CTC have not previously been assessed. In this study, providing expected prevalence information did not have a large effect on diagnostic decisions or patterns of visual search.</br